Szarell v. Summit County Court of Common Pleas et al
Danielle-Nichol Szarell |
Summit County Jail, Community Support Services, ADM, Northcoast Behavioral Health Institution and Summit County Court of Common Pleas |
5:2018cv02975 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Sara Lioi |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Supplement (Memorandum/Complaint) to Complaint and Memorandum filed by Danielle-Nichol Szarell. (Related document #3 , #1 ). (Attachments: #1 Letter and envelope) (O,K) |
Filing 3 Memorandum referencing the dockets at the Summit County Court of Common Pleas filed by Danielle-Nichol Szarell. Related document(s) #1 . (P,G) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Danielle-Nichol Szarell. (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Complaint against ADM, Community Support Services, Northcoast Behavioral Health Institution, Summit County Court of Common Pleas, Summit County Jail. Filing fee not paid, IFP, filed by Danielle-Nichol Szarell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285) (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (M,TL) |
Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.