Wilson v. City of Akron et al
| Leon Wilson |
| City of Akron, Vito Sinopoli and Mayor Dan Horrigan |
| 5:2019cv00156 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Marginal Entry Order granting Plaintiff's Motion for leave (Related Doc #3 ). The Amended Complaint attached to Doc. #3 shall be deemed filed. Judge John R. Adams on 2/4/19.(K,C) |
| Copy of #4 Order on Motion for leave mailed to Leon Wilson at 788 Yale Street, Akron, OH 44311 on 2/5/19. Related document(s) #4 . (K,C) |
| Filing 3 Motion for leave of court to amend complaint under Rule 15 FRCP filed by Plaintiff Leon Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (Related document(s) #1 ). (O,K) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Leon Wilson. (S,HR) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against City of Akron, Dan Horrigan, and Vito Sinopoli. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Leon Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285) (S,HR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (S,HR) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (S,HR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
