Miller v. Akron Police Department et al
| Chadwick Lynn Miller |
| Akron City Fire Department, Akron EMS and Akron Police Department |
| 5:2019cv01335 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Plaintiff Chadwick Lynn Miller. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(T,Je) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to ( #2 in 5:19-cv-01335-JRA) Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (2 in 5:19-cv-01371-JRA) Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (2 in 5:19-cv-01334-JRA) Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Chadwick Lynn Miller (unsigned). (O,K) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Chadwick Lynn Miller. Related document(s) #1 . (T,Je) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Akron City Fire Department, Akron EMS, Akron Police Department. Filing fee not paid, IFP.. Filed by Chadwick Lynn Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285, #4 Subpoena) (T,Je) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (T,Je) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (T,Je) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
