Gerlach, Inc. v. Gerlach Maschinenbau GmbH et al
Gerlach, Inc. |
Gerlach Maschinenbau GmbH and Troester Machinery Ltd. |
5:2019cv01601 |
July 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Sara Lioi |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 8/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Witness List)(D,N) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Gerlach, Inc.. (Pritchard, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Gerlach Maschinenbau GmbH, Troester Machinery Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (M,TL) |
Notice by Clerk that Gerlach, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Gerlach Maschinenbau GmbH, Troester Machinery Ltd. Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-9414897, filed by Gerlach, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Errata AO 120, #6 Summons , #7 Summons ) (Pritchard, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.