Mattison v. Trubridge, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tracy Mattison
Defendant: Trubridge, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2019cv01618
Filed: July 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: John R Adams
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2019 Filing 9 Notice of Filing Consent Form to Join in Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Tracy Mattison. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Jerome Jones, #2 Consent of Trenton Conner)(Lalak, Christopher)
August 28, 2019 Filing 8 Notice of Filing Consent Form to Join in Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Tracy Mattison. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Matthew Barkie)(Lalak, Christopher)
August 21, 2019 Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Robert J. Bowes, III filed by on behalf of Trubridge, Inc.. (Bowes, Robert)
August 21, 2019 Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Jamie M. Goetz-Anderson filed by on behalf of Trubridge, Inc.. (Goetz-Anderson, Jamie)
August 21, 2019 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Willis Towers Watson PLC for Trubridge, Inc. filed by Trubridge, Inc.. (Montgomery, David)
August 21, 2019 Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Trubridge, Inc.. (Montgomery, David)
August 5, 2019 Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Trubridge, Inc. on 7/31/2019, filed on behalf of Tracy Mattison Related document(s) #2 . (P,G)
July 31, 2019 Remark by Finance. Funds in the amount of $400.00 refunded on 07/31/2019 for receipt #0647-9418551. (K,Ve)
July 26, 2019 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Trubridge, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7019 0160 0000 5792 2810. (S,He)
July 16, 2019 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Trubridge, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL)
July 16, 2019 Filing 1 Class and Collective Action Complaint with jury demand against Trubridge, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9418582. Filed by Tracy Mattison. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - Consent of Tracy Mattison) (Lalak, Christopher)
July 16, 2019 Request to Clerk for refund of erroneous or duplicate on-line filing fee payment. Reason for refund request: duplicate payment. Receipt #: 0647-9418551, filed by Tracy Mattison. (Lalak, Christopher)
July 16, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL)
July 16, 2019 Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mattison v. Trubridge, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trubridge, Inc.
Represented By: David K. Montgomery
Represented By: Robert J. Bowes, III
Represented By: Jamie M. Goetz-Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Mattison
Represented By: Robi J. Baishnab
Represented By: Christopher J. Lalak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?