Mattison v. Trubridge, Inc.
Tracy Mattison |
Trubridge, Inc. |
5:2019cv01618 |
July 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Notice of Filing Consent Form to Join in Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Tracy Mattison. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Jerome Jones, #2 Consent of Trenton Conner)(Lalak, Christopher) |
Filing 8 Notice of Filing Consent Form to Join in Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Tracy Mattison. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Matthew Barkie)(Lalak, Christopher) |
Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Robert J. Bowes, III filed by on behalf of Trubridge, Inc.. (Bowes, Robert) |
Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Jamie M. Goetz-Anderson filed by on behalf of Trubridge, Inc.. (Goetz-Anderson, Jamie) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Willis Towers Watson PLC for Trubridge, Inc. filed by Trubridge, Inc.. (Montgomery, David) |
Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Trubridge, Inc.. (Montgomery, David) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Trubridge, Inc. on 7/31/2019, filed on behalf of Tracy Mattison Related document(s) #2 . (P,G) |
Remark by Finance. Funds in the amount of $400.00 refunded on 07/31/2019 for receipt #0647-9418551. (K,Ve) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Trubridge, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7019 0160 0000 5792 2810. (S,He) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Trubridge, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Class and Collective Action Complaint with jury demand against Trubridge, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9418582. Filed by Tracy Mattison. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - Consent of Tracy Mattison) (Lalak, Christopher) |
Request to Clerk for refund of erroneous or duplicate on-line filing fee payment. Reason for refund request: duplicate payment. Receipt #: 0647-9418551, filed by Tracy Mattison. (Lalak, Christopher) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mattison v. Trubridge, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Trubridge, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David K. Montgomery |
Represented By: | Robert J. Bowes, III |
Represented By: | Jamie M. Goetz-Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tracy Mattison | |
Represented By: | Robi J. Baishnab |
Represented By: | Christopher J. Lalak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.