Whitman v. Gray
| Richard Stanton Whitman |
| Warden David W Gray |
| 5:2019cv01818 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Attorney Appearance by William H. Lamb filed by on behalf of David W Gray. (Lamb, William)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order: Respondent shall file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order; Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of Respondent's Return of Writ to file a Reply (Traverse); Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond thereto. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/20/2019. (D,JJ)
|
|
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) and #4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to: Ohio Attorney General, 30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor, Columbus, OH 43215, and David Gray, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution, 68518 Bannock Road, St.Clairsville, OH 43950 on 8/20/2019. Copy of #4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to: Petitioner Richard Stanton Whitman #A694-724, Belmont Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH 43950 on 8/20/2019. (D,JJ)
|
|
Copy of Automatic Reference mailed to David W Gray, Warden, Belmont Correctional Inst., 68518 Bannock Road, St.Clairsville, OH 43950 and Richard Stanton Whitman, #A694-724, Be.C.I, P.O. Box 540, St.Clairsville, OH 43950 on 8/14/19. (D,MA)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2 entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/14/19. (D,MA)
|
|
Filing 3
Motion for stay and Abeyance filed by Petitioner Richard Stanton Whitman. Related document(s) #1 . (Y,A)
|
|
Filing 2
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (Y,A)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid $5. Receipt # 14660116420. Filed by Richard Stanton Whitman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit, #3 Inmate Demand Statement, #4 Affidavit of Prisoner) (Y,A)
|
|
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (Y,A)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (Y,A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whitman v. Gray | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Richard Stanton Whitman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden David W Gray | |
| Represented By: | William H. Lamb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
