Larson v. Media Collections, Inc.
| Hannah R. Larson |
| Media Collections, Inc. |
| 5:2019cv02223 |
| September 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Motion for default judgment against Media Collection, Inc. d/b/a Joseph, Mann and Creed on a Sum Certain filed by Plaintiff Hannah R. Larson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Attorney Fees and Costs, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit, #3 Proposed Order)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 9 Default Entered on 11/6/2019 against Defendant Media Collections, Inc. Sandy Opacich, Clerk by Judy L. Guyer, Deputy Clerk. Related document(s) #1 , #8 . (JLG) |
| Copy of #9 Default Entered mailed to Defendant Media Collections, Inc. d/b/a Joseph, Mann & Creed, 5915 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302, Mayfield Heights, Ohio 44124 on 11/6/2019. Related document(s) #9 . (JLG) |
| Filing 8 Application to Clerk for entry of default against Media Collections, Inc. d/b/a Joseph, Mann & Creed filed by Hannah R. Larson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Nathan C. Volheim, #2 Proposed Order)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service executed upon Media Collections, Inc. on 10/2/2019, filed on behalf of Hannah R. Larson (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Media Collections, Inc. (Issued to Media Collections, Inc., d/b/a Joseph, Mann & Creed, c/o Registered Agent Ronald S. Schickler) (W,K) |
| Filing 5 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by Hannah R. Larson. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (T,Je) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (T,Je) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (T,Je) |
| Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis filed by on behalf of Hannah R. Larson. (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 2 Attorney Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim filed by on behalf of Hannah R. Larson. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Media Collections, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9542609.. Filed by Hannah R. Larson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Larson v. Media Collections, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hannah R. Larson | |
| Represented By: | Nathan C. Volheim |
| Represented By: | Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Media Collections, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
