Menefee v. Gray
Terrell Menefee and Dennis Menefee |
Warden David W. Gray |
5:2019cv02454 |
October 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
David A Ruiz |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (Y,A) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Terrell Menefee. (Y,A) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Terrell Menefee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit of Petitioner, #3 Affidavit of Verity, #4 Appendix, #5 Stark County Court of Appeals Judgment Entry, #6 Stark County Common Pleas Judgment Entry) (Y,A) |
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of the second page of the Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a)., Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order and a blank civil cover sheet mailed to Terell Menefee at 68518 Bannock Road, St. Clairsville, OH 43950 on 10/21/19. Related document(s) #1 , #3 . (Y,A) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (Y,A) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case, (Y,A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.