Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc. v. Caremark PHC, LLC
The Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc. and Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc. doing business as The Health Plan |
Caremark PHC, LLC |
5:2020cv01202 |
June 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Kathleen B Burke |
Other Statutory Actions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Consent of the parties to this case being transferred to the docket of Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke for further proceedings. Judge John R. Adams on 7/8/20. (K,C) |
Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke assigned to case, pursuant to consent. Judge John R. Adams terminated. Related document(s) #10 . (M,TL) |
Filing 9 Joint Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction By a United States Magistrate Judge and Order of Reference filed by Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc.. Related document(s) #3 ,.(Proctor, Michael) |
Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Valerie B. Greenberg and Akivia P.A. Bassaragh for Caremark PHC, LLC. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #7 )(Related Doc #8 ). Judge John R. Adams on 7/1/20.(K,C) |
Filing 8 Motion for attorney Akivia P.A. Bassaragh, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10077004, filed by Defendant Caremark PHC, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Mullin, Jeanne) |
Filing 7 Motion for attorney Valerie Greenberg, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10076976, filed by Defendant Caremark PHC, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Mullin, Jeanne) |
Filing 6 Marginal Entry Order granting Defendant's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Caremark PHC, LLC answer due 7/31/2020. Judge John R. Adams on 6/24/20.(K,C) |
Filing 5 Motion for extension of time until July 31, 2020 to answer #1 or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Caremark PHC, LLC. (Mullin, Jeanne) |
Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Caremark PHC, LLC on 6/10/2020, filed on behalf of Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc. Related document(s) #3 . (P,G) |
Service by Clerk. Original Summons and Complaint addressed to Caremark PHC, LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7019 0700 0000 5268 7969. (O,K) |
Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Caremark PHC, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (T,Je) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (T,Je) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (T,Je) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by The Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc.. (Proctor, Michael) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Caremark PHC, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10013539.. Filed by The Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Proctor, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.