Brown v. Gray et al
Petitioner: Auletti Brown
Respondent: Ohio Dept of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden David Gray and Belmont Correctional Institution
Case Number: 5:2020cv01233
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Referring Judge: Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2020 Copy of Notice of Electronic Filing (Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer) mailed to Auletti Brown, 752073, P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH 43950 on 7/27/2020. (S,JM)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Respondent's #10 Motion for Extension of Time until 9/22/2020 to Answer. Respondent Gray's answer due 9/22/2020. Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp II on 7/27/2020. (S,JM)
July 24, 2020 Filing 10 Motion for extension of time until September 22, 2020 to answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 filed by Respondent David Gray. (Reese, Mary)
June 30, 2020 Filing 9 Amended Attorney Appearance by Mary Anne Reese filed by on behalf of David Gray. (Reese, Mary)
June 29, 2020 Filing 8 Notice of Deficiency of Counsel for Respondent filed by Auletti Brown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Related document(s) #6 .(J,G)
June 22, 2020 Filing 7 Motion for Stay and Abeyance filed by Petitioner Auletti Brown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(S,AN)
June 22, 2020 Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Mary Anne Reese filed by on behalf of David Gray. (Reese, Mary)
June 10, 2020 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order. The answer shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, and shall address all legal issues raised in the petition. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of Respondent's answer to respond by filing a reply. Respondent is granted leave of fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's reply to respond thereto by filing a sur-reply. Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp II on 6/10/2020. (S,JM)
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order granting Petitioner's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp II on 6/10/2020. (S,JM)
June 10, 2020 Copies of #4 and #5 mailed to Auletti Brown, 752073, P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH 43950, and Warden David Gray, 68518 Bannock Uniontown Road, St. Clairsville, OH 43950 (including #1 ), with email copies to Ohio Attorney General's Office on 6/10/2020. (S,JM)
June 10, 2020 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 6/10/2020. (S,SR)
June 5, 2020 Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order and a blank civil cover sheet mailed to Auletti Brown at P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH 43950 on 6/5/2020. Related document(s) #1 , #3 . (Y,A)
June 3, 2020 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (Y,A)
June 3, 2020 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Auletti Brown. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Demand Statement, #2 Inmate Demand Statement, #3 Envelope)(Y,A)
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Auletti Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Issues Raised, #2 Exhibit B- Ohio Supreme Court Memorandum, #3 Exhibit Ohio Supreme Court Motion to Reconsider, #4 Exhibit D-Judicial Notice, #5 Exhibit E- Petition for Post Conviction Relief, #6 Exhibit F- Memorandum, #7 Exhibit G- Correspondence from Herbert Joe) (Y,A)
June 3, 2020 Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case, (Y,A)
June 3, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (Y,A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Gray et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ohio Dept of Rehabilitation and Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden David Gray
Represented By: Mary Anne Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Belmont Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Auletti Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?