Stamm v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Scott Stamm |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 5:2020cv01573 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Sara Lioi |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration through the U.S. Attorney on 7/23/2020; Office of Regional Counsel by FedEx on 7/27/2020 (signed C-19); and the U.S. Attorney General by FedEx on 7/27/2020, filed on behalf of Scott Stamm. Related document(s) #7 . (S,AN) |
| Filing 7 Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 7/21/2020. (D,JJ) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 7/21/2020.(D,JJ)
|
| Filing 4 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 07/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List) (M,TL) |
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,TL) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Sara Lioi on 07/17/2020. (M,TL) |
| Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (M,TL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (M,TL) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Scott Stamm. (Wilson, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Scott Stamm. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to SSA, #3 Summons to Atty General, #4 Summons to Asst US Atty, #5 USM-285 to SSA, #6 USM-285 to Atty General, #7 USM-285 to U.S. Asst Atty) (Wilson, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stamm v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott Stamm | |
| Represented By: | Rachel C. Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Lynne H. Buck |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
