Phelps v. Merrick Bank Corporation et al
| Heather Phelps |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC and Merrick Bank Corporation |
| 5:2020cv01970 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Stipulated Settlement Notice filed by Heather Phelps. (Widman, Thomas) |
Filing 13
Order. This matter is dismissed as to Defendant Merrick Bank Corporation, with prejudice, each party bearing its own costs and fees. Judge John R. Adams on 10/8/2020. Related document #12 . (M,TL)
|
| Filing 12 Stipulation of Dismissal of Defendant Merrick Bank Corporation and proposed Order of Dismissal filed by Heather Phelps. (Widman, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 Marginal Entry Order granting Defendant's #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Merrick Bank Corporation shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 10/30/2020. Judge John R. Adams on 10/6/2020.(M,TL) |
| Filing 10 Marginal Entry Order granting Defendant's #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 11/2/2020. Judge John R. Adams on 10/6/2020.(M,TL) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 11/02/2020 to answer filed by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Wallace, David) |
| Filing 8 Attorney Appearance by David A. Wallace and Tyler K. Ibom filed on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Wallace, David) Modified text on 10/5/2020 (M,TL). |
| Filing 7 Consent Motion for extension of time until 10/30/2020 to answer filed by Defendant Merrick Bank Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Karr, Gwenn) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Cardworks, Inc. for Merrick Bank Corporation filed by Merrick Bank Corporation. (Karr, Gwenn) |
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Gwenn Snyder Karr filed by on behalf of Merrick Bank Corporation. (Karr, Gwenn) |
| Notice by Clerk that Merrick Bank Corporation failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (T,Je) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Equifax Information Services, LLC on 9/10/2020, filed on behalf of Heather Phelps (Widman, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Affidavit of Service by personal service executed upon Merrick Bank Corporation on 9/9/2020, filed on behalf of Heather Phelps (Widman, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Equifax Information Services, LLC, Merrick Bank Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number AOHNDC-10234249, filed by Heather Phelps. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Settlement Letter, #2 Exhibit B - PIF Letter, #3 Exhibit C - March Credit Report, #4 Exhibit D - FCRA Dispute, #5 Exhibit E - July Credit Report, #6 Civil Cover Sheet , #7 Summons - Merrick, #8 Summons - Equifax) (Widman, Thomas) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
