Montgomery v. Holmes County Sheriff's Office
| Margaret Montgomery |
| The Holmes County Sheriff's Office, Timothy W. Zimmerly and Holmes County Sheriff's Office |
| 5:2020cv02267 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Margaret Montgomery. Timothy W. Zimmerly waiver sent on 12/2/2020, answer due 2/1/2021 filed on behalf of Margaret Montgomery (Dyer, Carrie) |
| Filing 3 Amended Collective Action Complaint against Timothy W. Zimmerly, Holmes County Sheriff and adding new party defendant(s) Timothy W. Zimmerly, Holmes County Sheriff. Filed by Margaret Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join Lawsuit) (Dyer, Carrie) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (M,TL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Holmes County Sheriff's Office. Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number AOHNDC-10325942, filed by Margaret Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Mansell, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
