Dugan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Cynthia A Dugan |
Commissioner of Social Security |
5:2020cv02355 |
October 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jonathan D Greenberg |
Dan Aaron Polster |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 425 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Financial Transaction in the amount of $400.00 received from Paulette F. Balin & Associates. Receipt # 54660007734. (T,Je) |
Filing 7 Order. The Court construes Plaintiff's #6 motion to deny her IFP application as a motion to withdraw her IFP application and GRANTS the motion. Plaintiff's #3 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee no later than close of business (5:00 p.m.) on November 24, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 11/10/2020. (S,S) |
Filing 6 Motion to Deny Plaintiff's IFP Application filed by Cynthia A Dugan. Related document(s) #5 . (Shupe, Matthew) Modified on 11/6/2020 - Changed to a motion (J,G). |
Filing 5 Order directing plaintiff to submit an amended IFP application by 11/6/2020 demonstrating why payment of the filing fee would be an undue hardship. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 10/23/2020. (Related document #3 ) (S,S) |
Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (T,Je) |
Filing 3 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Cynthia A Dugan. (Balin, Paulette) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Notice filed by Cynthia A Dugan. (Balin, Paulette) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security . Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Cynthia A Dugan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet #2 Summons Social Security Administration, #3 Summons Department of Justice, #4 Summons Office of United States Attorney, #5 USM-285 Social Security Administration, #6 USM-285 Department of Justice, #7 USM-285 Office of United States Attorney) (Balin, Paulette) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (T,Je) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 10/15/2020. (T,Je) |
Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (T,Je) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dugan v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cynthia A Dugan | |
Represented By: | Matthew J. Shupe |
Represented By: | Paulette F. Balin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.