Dugan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Cynthia A Dugan
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 5:2020cv02355
Filed: October 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jonathan D Greenberg
Referring Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 425
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2020 Financial Transaction in the amount of $400.00 received from Paulette F. Balin & Associates. Receipt # 54660007734. (T,Je)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order. The Court construes Plaintiff's #6 motion to deny her IFP application as a motion to withdraw her IFP application and GRANTS the motion. Plaintiff's #3 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee no later than close of business (5:00 p.m.) on November 24, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 11/10/2020. (S,S)
November 6, 2020 Filing 6 Motion to Deny Plaintiff's IFP Application filed by Cynthia A Dugan. Related document(s) #5 . (Shupe, Matthew) Modified on 11/6/2020 - Changed to a motion (J,G).
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order directing plaintiff to submit an amended IFP application by 11/6/2020 demonstrating why payment of the filing fee would be an undue hardship. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 10/23/2020. (Related document #3 ) (S,S)
October 15, 2020 Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (T,Je)
October 15, 2020 Filing 3 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Cynthia A Dugan. (Balin, Paulette)
October 15, 2020 Filing 2 Certificate of Notice filed by Cynthia A Dugan. (Balin, Paulette)
October 15, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security . Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Cynthia A Dugan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet #2 Summons Social Security Administration, #3 Summons Department of Justice, #4 Summons Office of United States Attorney, #5 USM-285 Social Security Administration, #6 USM-285 Department of Justice, #7 USM-285 Office of United States Attorney) (Balin, Paulette)
October 15, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (T,Je)
October 15, 2020 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 10/15/2020. (T,Je)
October 15, 2020 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (T,Je)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dugan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia A Dugan
Represented By: Matthew J. Shupe
Represented By: Paulette F. Balin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?