First Communications, LLC v. Renteria et al
Plaintiff: First Communications, LLC
Defendant: Maximum Technology, LLC and Rafael Renteria
Case Number: 5:2020cv02616
Filed: November 20, 2020
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: John R Adams
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Reply in support of #3 Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, Motion to Transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for Convenience Page Limit Certification filed by Maximum Technology, LLC, Rafael Renteria. (Reilly, Marcos)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Reply in support of #3 Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, Motion to Transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for Convenience filed by Maximum Technology, LLC, Rafael Renteria. (Reilly, Marcos)
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate Summit Data Services, Inc. for First Communications, LLC filed by First Communications, LLC. (Hepp, Richard)
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Opposition to #3 Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, Motion to Transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for Convenience filed by First Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Mark Sollenberger)(Hepp, Richard)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with telephonic case management conference to be held on 1/25/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge John R. Adams. Judge John R. Adams on 12/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting, #2 Local Rule 30.1, #3 Magistrate Consent Form, #4 Budget, #5 ECF Policies and Procedures)(L,J)
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Marcos Reilly for Maximum Technology, LLC and Rafael Renteria. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #4 ). Judge John R. Adams on 12/14/20.(K,C)
December 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Proposed Stipulated Interim Order filed by First Communications, LLC. (Hepp, Richard)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Motion for attorney Marcos Reilly to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10443333, filed by Maximum Technology, LLC, Rafael Renteria. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Reilly)(Anderle, Robert)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for Convenience filed by Maximum Technology, LLC, Rafael Renteria. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit Declaration)(Anderle, Robert).
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (M,TL)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Summit County Common Pleas Court, case number CV-2020-11-3159 Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number AOHNDC-10439094.. Filed by Maximum Technology, LLC, Rafael Renteria. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A State Court Documents, #4 Exhibit B State of Ohio Documents, #5 Exhibit C Articles of Incorporation, #6 Exhibit D IL District Court Documents) (Anderle, Robert)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: First Communications, LLC v. Renteria et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maximum Technology, LLC
Represented By: Robert D. Anderle
Represented By: Marcos Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rafael Renteria
Represented By: Robert D. Anderle
Represented By: Marcos Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: First Communications, LLC
Represented By: Richard E. Hepp
Represented By: Jonathon J. Korinko
Represented By: Thomas O. Crist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?