King v. Canton Ohio Police Department, et al.
Deny L. King |
Canton Ohio Police Department and John Doe |
5:2020cv02648 |
November 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Benita Y Pearson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to Plaintiff for service upon Canton Ohio Police Department and John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (Y,A) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Canton Ohio Police Department and John Doe. Filing fee paid, $400.00. Receipt # 14660127628. Filed by Deny L. King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Y,A) |
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of the second page of the Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Copy of #1 Complaint and a blank civil cover sheet mailed to Deny L. King at 2240 Hubbard Road, Youngstown, OH 44505 on 11/25/2020. Related document(s) #1 . (Y,A) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (Y,A) |
Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (Y,A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.