Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Michael Davis
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 5:2020cv02807
Filed: December 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: J Philip Calabrese
Referring Judge: Thomas M Parker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 425
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service through the U.S. Attorney executed upon Commissioner of Social Security on 12/23/2020; the U.S. Attorney General (signed c-19) and Office of the Regional Chief Counsel on 12/28/2020 by FedEx filed on behalf of Michael Davis. Related document(s) #7 . (L,Br)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 12/22/2020. (D,JJ)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Plaintiff Davis's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #3 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 12/22/2020. (D,JJ)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (T,Je)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Michael Davis. Related document(s) #1 , #2 . (Balin, Paulette)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Certificate of Notice filed by Michael Davis. Related document(s) #1 .(Balin, Paulette)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Michael Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 USM-285, #5 USM-285, #6 USM-285, #7 Summons) (Balin, Paulette)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (T,Je)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 12/21/2020. (T,Je)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (T,Je)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Davis
Represented By: Matthew J. Shupe
Represented By: Paulette F. Balin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?