Davis v. Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
Veda Davis |
Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority and Herman Hill |
5:2021cv00910 |
May 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
Kathleen B Burke |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order: with telephonic case management conference to be held on 7/29/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. The Courts bridge line will be used for the Case Management Conference. The Court will send the bridge line instructions to counsel of record via email. Attorneys are cautioned not to rely on the docket entry only. Read the attached Order for additional information and requirements. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 6/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Report of Parties' Planning Meeting, #2 Appendix K)(P,G) |
Filing 8 Consent of the parties to this case being transferred to the docket of Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke for further proceedings. Judge John R. Adams on 6/24/21. (K,C) |
Filing 7 Joint Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and Order of Reference filed by Veda Davis. (Lalak, Christopher) |
Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke assigned to case. pursuant to consent. Judge John R. Adams terminated. Related document(s) #8 . (M,TL) |
Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Herman Hill. (Fiorello, Joseph) |
Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority. (Fiorello, Joseph) Modified filers on 6/4/2021 (M,TL). |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Joseph M. Fiorello and Thomas P. Mannion filed by on behalf of Herman Hill, Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority. (Fiorello, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Herman Hill on 5/11/2021; Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority on 5/11/2021, (both signed c-19)filed on behalf of Veda Davis. Related document(s) #2 . (M,TL) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Herman Hill (Receipt # 7017 3380 0000 7266 6329), Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority (Receipt # 7017 3380 0000 7266 6343) placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (Related Doc. No. #2 ). (T,Je) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Herman Hill and Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (O,K) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Herman Hill, Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10812109.. Filed by Veda Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - HUD Officials to Review Allegations of Corruption and Fraud Against Jackson Housing Commission Directors, #2 Exhibit 2 - New Housing Director Dogged by Past, #3 Exhibit 3 - New House, New Job: Stark Metro Housing Authority Success Story or Special Favor?, #4 Exhibit 4 - Stark Metro Housing Director Defends His Actions to Board, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority, #7 Summons Herman Hill) (Lalak, Christopher) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (O,K) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (O,K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.