Heinz v. Eradal, Inc. et al
| Timothy J. Heinz |
| Eradal, Inc. and Attorney Peter Kratcoski |
| 5:2021cv02263 |
| December 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Notice of Default Upon Respondent's Silence to the Petition for Declaratory Judgment filed by Timothy J. Heinz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Related document(s) #4 .(K,L)
|
|
Filing 4
Memorandum in Support of Petition for Declaratory Judgment #1 filed by Timothy J. Heinz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Various Financial Documents, #2 Envelope)(M,TL)
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Consent Form signed by Plaintiff Timothy J. Heinz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(M,TL)
|
|
Filing 2
Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (M,TL)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint (Petition for Declaratory Judgment) against Eradal, Inc., Peter Kratcoski. Filing fee paid, $402.00, receipt # 54660008302 filed by Timothy J. Heinz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit A - Financial Documents, #4 Envelope) (M,TL)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (M,TL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
