Grogan v. Bobby
Petitioner: Juan Romero Grogan, Jr.
Respondent: David Bobby and Warden David Bobby
Case Number: 5:2022cv00274
Filed: February 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Donald C Nugent
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Financial Transaction in the amount of $5.00 received from Juan R. Grogan, Jr. Receipt # 44660006100. (D,Ju)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order. Petitioner has not tendered the required filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the petitioner shall either pay the filing fee of $5.00, or complete and file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 3/21/2022. (Related document #1 ) (Attachments: #1 Financial Application) (S,S)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Copy of #3 Order mailed to Juan Romero Grogan, Jr., 27240-509, NEOCC, 2240 Hubbard Road, Youngstown, OH 44503 on 3/21/2022. (S,S)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Supplement (Civil Cover Sheet) filed by Juan Romero Grogan, Jr. Related document(s) #1 . (R,Li)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody. Filing fee not paid. Filed by Juan Romero Grogan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Documents from State Court Case: Canton Municipal Court, 2020CRA05246 and Stark County Common Pleas, 2020 CR 2299, #2 Federal Indictment, USDC Northern District of Ohio, 5:21 CR 85, #3 Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint, #4 Search Warrants from State Case and Supporting Documents, #5 Memorandum in Support of Legal Arguments, #6 transmittal letter, #7 envelope) (G,M)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and a blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Juan R. Grogan, Jr. 27240-509 at NEOCC 2240 Hubbard Road, Youngstown, OH 44505 on 2/18/2022. Related document(s) #1 . (G,M)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. (G,M)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (G,M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grogan v. Bobby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Romero Grogan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Bobby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden David Bobby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?