Norris v. Hill
| Robert Lee Norris |
| Warden Leon Hill |
| 5:2022cv00445 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Donald C Nugent |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgment from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals of receipt of transfer order. Re: #3 (USCA# 22-3363). (F,AW) |
Filing 3
Order of Transfer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. This 2254 petition is the second or successive petition filed by Norris challenging his 1993 conviction in the Criminal Case. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631, this action is hereby transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision may not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. re #1 . Judge Donald C. Nugent on 4/18/2022. (M,S)
|
| Copy of #3 Order of Transfer to Sixth Circuit, mailed to Robert Lee Norris #281-431 and Warden, Leon Hill, Marion Correctional Institution P.O. Box 57 Marion, OH 43301-0057 on 4/18/2022. Related document(s) #3 . (M,S) |
| Financial Transaction in the amount of 5.00 received from Robert Norris. Receipt # 34660013019 (K,AR) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid. Filed by Robert Lee Norris. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Appendix Exhibits, #4 Exhibit 1 - Transcript of Proceedings, #5 Exhibit 2 - Letter dated 9-10-93, #6 Exhibit 3 - Judgment Entry dated 9-10-93, #7 Exhibit 4 - Judgment Entry 1-4-94, #8 Exhibit 5 - Judgement Entry dated 10-13-95, #9 Exhibit 6 - Judgment Entry dated 7-9-98, #10 Exhibit 7 - Judgment Entry dated 9-17-98, #11 Exhibit 8 - Appearance Docket, #12 Exhibit 9 - Letter dated 4-17-20, #13 Exhibit 10 - Motion for Jail-Time Credit, #14 Exhibit 11 - Judgment Entry dated 11-20-20, #15 Exhibit 12 - Letter dated 8-3-21 with Mail Logs, #16 Exhibit 13 - Judgment Entry dated 12-9-21, #17 Envelope) (S,DM) |
| Copy of petition and docket sheet mailed to Robert Lee Norris #281-431 at P.O. Box 57, Marion, OH 43301-0057 on 3/22/2022. (S,DM) |
| Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Direct Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Norris v. Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Robert Lee Norris | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Leon Hill | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
