Feathers v. Hill
David E. Feathers |
Warden Leon Hill |
5:2022cv00541 |
April 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Amanda M Knapp |
James R Knepp |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent shall file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the filing of Respondent's Return of Writ to file a Reply (Traverse). Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond thereto. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 5/20/2022. (Issued by ordinary mail to Petitioner and Respondent, with copy of petition for writ of habeas corpus to Respondent, and via email to Brian Higgins, Office of Ohio Attorney General, on 5/20/2022.). Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 5/20/2022. (S,S) |
Copy of #5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to David E. Feathers, #A763-828, Marion Correctional Institution, 940 Marion Williamsport Rd., Marion, OH 43301 on 5/20/2022. (S,S) |
Filing 4 Order granting petitioner's #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 5/18/2022. (S,S) |
Copy of #4 Order mailed to David E. Feathers, #A763-828, Marion Correctional Institution, 940 Marion Williamsport Rd., Marion, OH 43301 on 5/18/2022. (S,S) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James R. Knepp II on 5/17/2022. (B,JL) |
Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,TL) |
Filing 2 Affidavit of Prisoner filed by David E. Feathers. (Attachments: #1 Request for Certified Account Statement, #2 Inmate Demand Statement (Summary))(M,TL) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, filed by David E. Feathers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Argument in Support, #3 Letter to the Clerk, #4 Envelope) (M,TL) |
Copy of docket sheet, #3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) mailed to David E. Feathers #A763-828, Marion Correctional Institution, 940 Marion Williamsport Rd., Marion, OH 43301 on 04/06/2022. (M,TL) |
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Feathers v. Hill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: David E. Feathers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Leon Hill | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.