Spragling et al v. 7-Eleven. Inc., et al
| Ned Spragling and Dawn Spragling |
| 7-Eleven, 7-Eleven, Inc., Unknown Owner/Manager/Franchisee, John Does, Jane Does, Doe Partnerships, Doe Corporations, Doe Governmental Agencies and Doe Entities |
| 5:2022cv00726 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Acknowledgement of receipt of remand received on July 14, 2022 from Summit County County Court of Common Pleas. Related document(s) #13 . (H,JL) |
| Filing 13 Certified copy of order of remand and docket sheet mailed to Summit County Court of Common Pleas with acknowledgement of receipt enclosed. Related document(s) #11 . (S,DM) |
| Filing 12 Judgment Entry Terminating Case. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 6/27/2022. (Y,A) |
Filing 11
Order: Upon examination of the basis for its jurisdiction, the Court determines that Defendant has not carried its burden of establishing the amount in controversy for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court REMANDS this case to the Summit County Court of Common Pleas. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 6/27/2022. (Y,A)
|
| Filing 10 Brief on Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Ned Spragling. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Meeker, Robert) |
| Filing 9 Brief in Support of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Articles of Incorporation) Related Document #8 . (Cononico, Vincent) |
|
Filing 8
Order: The Court ORDERS the parties to submit briefs not to exceed seven pages no later than June 20, 2022 addressing the Court's jurisdiction. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 6/7/2022. (Y,A)
|
| Filing 7 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by 7-Eleven, Inc.. (Cononico, Vincent) |
| Filing 6 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand (Related Doc #1 ) filed by 7-Eleven, Inc.. (Cononico, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by 7-Eleven, Inc.. (Cononico, Vincent) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (H,Ch) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet, filed by 7-Eleven, Inc. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Cononico, Vincent) |
| Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (H,Ch) |
| Notice by Clerk that 7-Eleven, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (H,Ch) |
| Filing 2 Amended Notice of Removal (with corrected Exhibit 3) filed by 7-Eleven, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Instructions for Service of Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Amended Exhibit 3 - Summit County Docket). (Related document(s) #1 ) (Cononico, Vincent) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Summit County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV-2022-03-0940. Filing fee paid $402, receipt number AOHNDC-11405408. Filed by 7-Eleven, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Instructions for Service of Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summit County Court Docket). (Cononico, Vincent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
