Whatmough v. Menard, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: John Whatmough
Defendant: Menard, Inc. aka Menard, Inc., Menard, Inc., Menard, Inc. c/o Corporation Service Company, John Doe Contractor 1-10 c/o Corporation Service Company, Menards and John Doe Contractor
Case Number: 5:2022cv01185
Filed: July 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Amanda M Knapp
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 9/1/2022. (S,S)
August 24, 2022 Filing 13 Proposed Stipulation filed by Menard, Inc., Menards. (Guice, Gregory)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Case Management Conference Order. Case is assigned to the standard track. Deadline to file motion seeking to add parties or amend pleadings: September 19, 2022. Deadline to complete all non-expert discovery: January 15, 2023. Deadline for party with burden of proof on a claim or defense to disclose expert report(s): January 15, 2023. Deadline for parties without burden of proof on claim or defense to disclose rebuttal expert report(s): February 15, 2023. Deadline to complete expert discovery: March 15, 2023. Deadline for filing dispositive motions: April 15, 2023. Joint Status Report due on or before November 22, 2022. Telephonic status conference set for November 29, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel should carefully review the requirements of this Order to ensure compliance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 8/23/2022. (Related document #11 ) (S,S)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Minute Order of Case Management Conference held on 8/19/2022. The parties and the Court discussed the underlying facts of the case, the potential for alternative dispute resolution, and the parties proposed schedule, which the Court modified. The parties will file a Joint Status Report no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 22, 2022, as described in the separately filed CMC Plan Order. The Court will conduct a Telephonic Status Conference on November 29, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Instructions for connecting to the conference will be emailed to counsel of record. Additional case management dates and deadlines were discussed with counsel and are set forth in a separately filed CMC Plan Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 8/23/2022. (Time: 33 min.) (S,S)
August 18, 2022 Filing 10 Attorney Appearance of Co-Counsel by Holly M. Wilson filed by on behalf of Menard, Inc.. (Wilson, Holly)
August 16, 2022 Filing 9 Initial Disclosures of Defendant filed by Menard, Inc., Menards. (Guice, Gregory)
August 16, 2022 Filing 8 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Menard, Inc., Menards. (Guice, Gregory)
August 3, 2022 Filing 7 Proposed Stipulation Stipulation and Protective Order filed by Menard, Inc., Menards. (Guice, Gregory)
July 18, 2022 Filing 6 Consent of the parties to this case being transferred to the docket of Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp for further proceedings. Judge John R. Adams on 7/18/22. (K,C)
July 18, 2022 Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp assigned to case pursuant to consent. Judge John R. Adams terminated. Related document(s) #6 . (M,TL)
July 18, 2022 IMPORTANT: Notice of Hearing [non-document]. Telephonic Case Management Conference rescheduled for 8/19/2022 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. Lead counsel is expected to attend. Parties and party representatives are welcome to attend, but their attendance is not required. Bridge line instructions for the telephonic CMC will be emailed to counsel of record. (S,S)
July 15, 2022 Filing 5 Proposed Consent to Magistrate filed by All Plaintiffs. (Van Blargan, Christopher)
July 14, 2022 Filing 4 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with telephonic case management conference to be held on 8/8/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge John R. Adams. Judge John R. Adams on 7/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting, #2 Local Rule 30.1, #3 Magistrate Consent Form, #4 Budget, #5 ECF Policies and Procedures)(L,J)
July 7, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Menard, Inc., Menards. (Guice, Gregory)
July 6, 2022 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (M,TL)
July 6, 2022 Judge John R. Adams assigned to case (M,TL)
July 6, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (M,TL)
July 5, 2022 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Summit County Common Pleas Court, case number CV-2022-06-1836 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-11504205.. Filed by Menard, Inc. c/o Corporation Service Company, Menard, Inc., Menard, Inc. aka Menard, Inc., John Doe Contractor 1-10 c/o Corporation Service Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Complaint, #2 Exhibit "B" - Docket, #3 Exhibit "C" - Answer, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Guice, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whatmough v. Menard, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Whatmough
Represented By: Christopher J. Van Blargan
Represented By: Michael J. Maillis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Menard, Inc. aka Menard, Inc.
Represented By: Gregory G. Guice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Menard, Inc.
Represented By: Gregory G. Guice
Represented By: Holly M. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Menard, Inc. c/o Corporation Service Company
Represented By: Gregory G. Guice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Contractor 1-10 c/o Corporation Service Company
Represented By: Gregory G. Guice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Menards
Represented By: Gregory G. Guice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Contractor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?