Arsham v. Commissioner of Social Security
| David Michael Arsham |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2022cv01465 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 425 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Consent of the parties to this case being transferred to the docket of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker for further proceedings. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 10/12/2022. (S,SR)
|
|
Filing 5
Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Related document(s) #1 . (Asher, Ruchi)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker assigned to case pursuant to consent. Judge Charles Esque Fleming terminated. Related document(s) #6 . (L,MI)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Please note: counsel for the parties are under an obligation to meet and confer prior to the filing of plaintiff's reply brief; see the attached order for specific details. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/17/2022. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 2
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 8/17/2022. (O,K)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11571644. Filed by David Michael Arsham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Balin, Paulette)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 8/17/2022. (O,K)
|
|
Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (O,K)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (O,K)
|
|
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (O,K)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arsham v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Michael Arsham | |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Shupe |
| Represented By: | Paulette F. Balin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
