Paddock Enterprises, LLC v. United States of America
| Paddock Enterprises, LLC |
| United States of America |
| 5:2022cv01558 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Sara Lioi |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607 Real Property Tort to Land |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Return of Service by Clerk by Certified Mail executed upon Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States on 9/13/2022 filed on behalf of Paddock Enterprises, LLC Related document(s)[4. (B,DL)
|
|
Filing 6
Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon United States of America on 9/12/2022 filed on behalf of Paddock Enterprises, LLC. Related document(s) #4 . (M,TL)
|
|
Service by Clerk. Summons, Complaint, and Initial Order addressed to Michelle M. Baeppler, First Assistant U.S. Attorney for Northern District of Ohio; and Merrick Garland, Attorney General, placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt numbers 7021 1970 0000 8678 8389 / 7021 1970 0000 8678 8396. (M,CE)
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List) (O,K)
|
|
Filing 4
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (O,K)
|
|
Filing 3
Supplement to Complaint - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Paddock Enterprises, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Brown, Kegan)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent O-I Glass, Inc. for Paddock Enterprises, LLC filed by Paddock Enterprises, LLC. (Brown, Kegan)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against United States of America. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11597368.. Filed by Paddock Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- September 14, 1983 Letter, #2 Exhibit 2- September 20, 1983 Letter, #3 Exhibit 3 - March 16, 1984 Letter, #4 Exhibit 4 - November 6, 1984 Letter, #5 Exhibit 5- Map of Jaite Mill, #6 Exhibit 6- EECA Approval Memo, #7 Exhibit 7- TCRA Action Memo, #8 Exhibit 8- Final Action Memo, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons, #11 Summons) (Brown, Kegan)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (O,K)
|
|
Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (O,K)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Paddock Enterprises, LLC v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paddock Enterprises, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kegan A. Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
