Unitech Composites, Inc. v. Prospect Mold & Die Company
Plaintiff: Unitech Composites, Inc.
Defendant: Prospect Mold & Die Company
Case Number: 5:2022cv01797
Filed: October 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: John R Adams
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney James S. Yu and attorney Jamaica P. Szeliga for Prospect Mold & Die Company. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #8 ); (Related Doc #9 ). Judge John R. Adams on 11/21/22.(K,C)
November 21, 2022 Filing 9 Motion for attorney Jamaica P. Szeliga to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11721975, filed by Defendant Prospect Mold & Die Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)(Foley, Erin)
November 21, 2022 Filing 8 Motion for attorney James S. Yu to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11721954, filed by Defendant Prospect Mold & Die Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standings)(Foley, Erin)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Jeanah Park and attorney Zachary J. Watters for Unitech Composites, Inc. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #4 ); (Related Doc #5 ). Judge John R. Adams on 11/15/22.(K,C)
November 14, 2022 Filing 7 Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Prospect Mold & Die Company. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Mark Withrow, #3 Affidavit Declaration of Mark Tattershall)(Foley, Erin)
November 14, 2022 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Prospect Mold & Die Company. (Foley, Erin)
November 8, 2022 Filing 5 Motion for attorney Zachary J. Watters to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11704085, filed by Plaintiff Unitech Composites, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Admission - Illinois, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Wisconsin, #3 Exhibit Court Admissions)(Marsh, John)
November 8, 2022 Filing 4 Motion for attorney Jeanah Park to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number BOHNDC-11704041, filed by Plaintiff Unitech Composites, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Bar Admissions, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit Court Admissions)(Marsh, John)
October 31, 2022 Filing 3 Joint Proposed Stipulation of Extension of Time to Move or Plead filed by Unitech Composites, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 .(Marsh, John)
October 6, 2022 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Prospect Mold & Die Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (O,K)
October 6, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint against Prospect Mold & Die Company. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number COHNDC-11652979. Filed by Unitech Composites, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 July 12 Offer Letter, #3 Exhibit 3 July 13 Offer Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons, #6 Corporate Disclosure) (Marsh, John) Modified text on 10/6/2022 (O,K).
October 6, 2022 Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (O,K)
October 6, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (O,K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Unitech Composites, Inc. v. Prospect Mold & Die Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Unitech Composites, Inc.
Represented By: John F. Marsh
Represented By: Jeanah Park
Represented By: Zachary J. Watters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prospect Mold & Die Company
Represented By: Jamaica P. Szeliga
Represented By: Erin D. Foley
Represented By: James S. Yu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?