J.M. Smucker Company et al v. East End Groceries, Inc.
| J.M. Smucker Company and Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. |
| East End Groceries, Inc. |
| 5:2022cv02055 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Judgment Entry For the reasons set forth in the Order filed contemporaneously with this Default Judgment, judgment is rendered in favor of Plaintiffs J.M. Smucker Company and Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. and against Defendant East End Groceries, Inc. Judgment is rendered in favor of Plaintiffs J.M. Smucker Company and Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. and against Defendant East End Groceries, Inc. in the amount of (1) $277,208.35 plus post-judgment interest accruing on this amount from the date of this Judgment Entry, at a rate of 5% per annum, and (2) $402.00 in costs incurred. This Judgment Entry constitutes entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 6/30/2023. (JLG) |
Filing 14
Order For the reasons set forth herein, judgment will be entered in favor of Plaintiffs J.M. Smucker Company, et al. and against Defendant East End Groceries, Inc. in the amount of $277,208.35, plus post-judgment interest accruing from the date judgment is entered, at a rate of 5% per annum, and costs in the amount of $402. A separate judgment entry will be docketed. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 6/30/2023. Related document(s) #8 , #9 , #10 , #13 . (JLG)
|
| Copy of #14 Order on Motion for Default Judgment and #15 Judgment Entry mailed to Defendant East End Groceries, Inc., 20 Red Ground Road, Old Westbury, NY 11568 on 6/30/2023. Related document(s) #14 , #15 . (JLG) |
| Filing 13 Motion for default judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(B) filed by J.M. Smucker Company, Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. Related document(s) #10 . (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit A-Mikula Affidavit ISO Motion for Default Judgment)(Mikula, Chelsea) Modified text on 5/4/2023 (H,Ch). |
|
Filing 12
Order On 1/5/2023, Plaintiffs J.M. Smucker Company and Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. requested the Clerk to enter a default judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant East End Groceries, LLC. See ECF No. #8 . Default was entered and filed to the docket on 3/13/2023. See ECF No. #10 . With default having been entered, Plaintiffs' subsequent application for entry of default (ECF No. #11 ), filed on 3/31/2023, is improper. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to appropriately file a motion for default judgment against Defendant, indicating that Defendant has been properly served with the Summons and Complaint, and detailing support for all demands, among other things necessary. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/19/2023. (JLG)
|
| Filing 11 Application to Clerk for entry of default against East End Groceries, Inc. filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Mikula in Support of Plaintiffs' Application for Default Judgment)(Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 10 Default Entered on 3/13/2023 against Defendant East End Groceries, Inc. Sandy Opacich, Clerk by Judy L. Guyer, Deputy Clerk. (JLG) |
| Copy of #10 Entry of Default mailed to Defendant East End Groceries, Inc., 20 Red Ground Road, Old Westbury, NY 11568 on 3/13/2023. Related document(s) #10 . (JLG) |
| Filing 9 Supplement to Application to enter Default - USPS Tracking Details showing Service Delivery (7018 1830 0002 2597 2593), filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #8 . (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 8 Application to Clerk for entry of default against Defendant, East End Groceries, Inc. filed by All Plaintiffs. (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to East End Groceries, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7018 1830 0002 2597 2593. (P,G) |
| Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Lucille R. Richman filed by on behalf of J.M. Smucker Company, Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. (Richman, Lucille) . |
| Filing 6 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon East End Groceries, Inc. (B,DL) |
| Filing 5 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 4 Attorney to file Praecipe. Supplement to Complaint, - Summons for Service upon Defendant, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Mikula, Chelsea) Modified on 11/23/2022 to advise attorney to file praecipe and original summons. (B,DL). |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided, no summons issued. (B,DL) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate Smucker International Holding Company for Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. filed by All Plaintiffs. (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against East End Groceries, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11712558. Filed by J.M. Smucker Company, Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Terms Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Unpaid Smucker Invoices) (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (B,DL) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (B,DL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
