Henderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Neal Henderson |
| Commisioner of Social Security |
| 5:2022cv02119 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jonathan D Greenberg |
| Donald C Nugent |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until February 7, 2023 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Commissioner of Social Security answer due 2/7/2023. Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 1/20/23.(D,Ky)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until February 7, 2023 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Commisioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Asher, Ruchi) |
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 11/22/22. (D,Ky)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (B,DL) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Neal Henderson. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Neal Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Shifrin, Debra) |
| Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. (B,DL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (B,DL) |
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 11/22/22.(D,Ky)
|
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 11/22/2022. (B,DL) |
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (B,DL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henderson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Neal Henderson | |
| Represented By: | Debra S. Shifrin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commisioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Represented By: | Cara Staley Rafferty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
