Lexington Luminance LLC v. Technical Consumer Products, Inc.
Lexington Luminance LLC |
Technical Consumer Products, Inc. |
5:2022cv02235 |
December 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
David A Ruiz |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Technical Consumer Products, Inc.. (Cupar, David) |
Filing 9 Motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim filed by Defendant Technical Consumer Products, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, #2 Exhibit Declaration of David Cupar, #3 Exhibit 1 - Office Action dated 3/8/2004, #4 Exhibit 2 - Amendment dated 5/22/2004, #5 Exhibit 3 - 12/6/2013 Grant of Reexamination, #6 Exhibit 4 - 04/14/2014 Office Action, #7 Exhibit 5 - 05/14/2014 Amendment, #8 Exhibit 6 - 12/5/201 Reexamination Certificate, #9 Exhibit 7 - NIRC, #10 Exhibit 8 - Lighting Supplies Complaint, #11 Exhibit 9 - Menards Complaint, #12 Exhibit 10 - Prelim Resp IPR2017-1780)(Cupar, David) |
Filing 8 Motion for extension of time until 02/09/2023 to answer Move or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Plaintiff Lexington Luminance LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wernow, Howard) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #8 Motion for extension of time until 02/09/2023 for Defendant to answer Move or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Defendant Technical Consumer Products, Inc. answer due 02/09/2023. Judge David A. Ruiz on 1/9/2023. (G,CA) |
Filing 7 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Technical Consumer Products, Inc. on 12/20/2022, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Lexington Luminance LLC. Related document(s) #4 (B,DL) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #5 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Robert David Katz for Lexington Luminance LLC. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge David A. Ruiz on 12/27/2022. Related document #6 (G,CA) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Technical Consumer Products, Inc placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified Mail mail. Receipt # 7020 0090 0001 4429 2350. (B,DL) |
Filing 6 Supplement for attorney Robert D. Katz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11753014, filed by Plaintiff Lexington Luminance LLC. Related document(s) #5 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration with Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order)(Wernow, Howard) Modified on 12/15/2022 (S,KM). |
Filing 5 Motion for attorney Robert D. Katz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11753014, filed by Plaintiff Lexington Luminance LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration #2 Proposed Order)(Wernow, Howard) Modified on 12/15/2022 (S,KM). |
Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Technical Consumer Products, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,DL) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Lexington Luminance LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 2 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Lexington Luminance LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 1 Complaint for patent infringement with jury demand against Technical Consumer Products, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11749386. Filed by Lexington Luminance LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-US Patent 6936851, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons). (Wernow, Howard) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (B,DL) |
This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (B,DL) |
Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. (B,DL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lexington Luminance LLC v. Technical Consumer Products, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lexington Luminance LLC | |
Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
Represented By: | Robert David Katz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Technical Consumer Products, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David B. Cupar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.