Alexander v. MRI Software, LLC
| James Charles Alexander, Jr. |
| MRI Software, LLC doing business as PI Company |
| 5:2022cv02277 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for "guidance" or "clarification" regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the "status" of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 2/1/2023. (P,K)
|
| Filing 10 Return of Service by personal service executed upon MRI Software, LLC on 1/5/2023, filed on behalf of James Charles Alexander, Jr (Fok, Devin) |
|
Order Defendant MRI Software, LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise plead until February 27, 2023 (Doc. No. #9 ) is granted. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/26/2023.(P,K)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until February 27, 2023 to answer or otherwise plead, filed by Defendant MRI Software, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). (Raether, Ronald) |
| Filing 8 Motion for attorney Devin H. Fok to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11771621, filed by Plaintiff James Charles Alexander, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Miller-Novak, Matthew) |
|
Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Devin Fok for James Charles Alexander, Jr. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #8 ). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 12/29/2022.(P,K)
|
| Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,HR) |
| Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Ohio Southern. Case number 1:22-cv-00750. Electronic record received. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Inter-district Transfer. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/19/2022. (kkz) [Transferred from ohsd on 12/19/2022.]
|
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (S,HR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,HR) |
| Case transferred to District of Northern District of Ohio. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (kkz) [Transferred from ohsd on 12/19/2022.] |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to MRI Software LLC. (bjr) Modified on 12/19/2022 adding document (bjr). [Transferred from ohsd on 12/19/2022.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE - Clerk's Notice to Counsel regarding Pro Hac Vice admission. (bjr) [Transferred from ohsd on 12/19/2022.] |
| Filing 2 If this case is referred it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjr) [Transferred from ohsd on 12/19/2022.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against MRI Software ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9185340), filed by James Charles Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Miller-Novak, Matthew) [Transferred from ohsd on 12/19/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alexander v. MRI Software, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Charles Alexander, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew E. Miller-Novak |
| Represented By: | Devin H. Fok |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MRI Software, LLC doing business as PI Company | |
| Represented By: | Ronald I. Raether, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
