Rhouzala v. Hyponex Corporation
Issam Rhouzala |
Hyponex Corporation and Hyponex Corporation doing business as ScottsMiracle-Gro |
5:2022cv02311 |
December 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Sara Lioi |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Issam Rhouzala. Hyponex Corporation waiver sent on 12/28/2022, answer due 2/26/2023 filed on behalf of Issam Rhouzala (Dubow, Daniel) |
Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Hyponex Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,DL) |
Filing 2 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/23/22. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Witness List, #2 Exhibit B - Exhibit List) (B,DL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (B,DL) |
Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (B,DL) |
Filing 1 Complaint for damages and reinstatement with jury demand against Hyponex Corporation. Filing fee paid $ 402.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-11766748. Filed by Issam Rhouzala. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Determination and notice of rights). (Degraffinried, Shashelia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.