Ridenour v. Beyond Expectations Barber College, LLC
Amaya Ridenour |
BEYOND EXPECTATIONS BARBER COLLEGE, LLC |
5:2023cv00864 |
April 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James S Gwin |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/14/23 setting a case management conference on 8/9/2023 at 09:30 AM to be held by video conference (Cleveland) before Judge James S. Gwin. This Court requires the attendance of (1) all parties, (2) lead counsel, and (3) a representative with full authority for settlement purposes. (Attachments: #1 Parties' Planning Meeting Report, #2 Local Rule 30.1)(T,A) |
Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Beyond Expectations Barber College, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - PPP Application)(Smith, David contains s/ of Nicholas J. Hanek) Modified on 6/13/2023 (H,JL). |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Beyond Expectations Barber College, LLC on 5/16/2023, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Amaya Ridenour. Related document(s) #2 . (B,DL) |
Remark by Finance. Funds in the amount of $402.00 refunded on 05/01/2023 for receipt AOHNDC-11963500. (K,Ve) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Beyond Expectations Barber College, LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7020 0640 0000 4643 3294. (S,T) |
Request to Clerk for refund of erroneous or duplicate on-line filing fee payment. Reason for refund request: Duplicate Filing Fee. Receipt #: AOHNDC-11963500, filed by Amaya Ridenour. Related document(s) #1 . (S,HR) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Beyond Expectations Barber College, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,T) |
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (S,T) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,T) |
Filing 1 Complaint for Damages with jury demand against Beyond Expectations Barber College, LLC. Filing fee paid $402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11963535. Filed by Amaya Ridenour. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Wade-Kilts, Claire) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ridenour v. Beyond Expectations Barber College, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Amaya Ridenour | |
Represented By: | Claire I. Wade-Kilts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BEYOND EXPECTATIONS BARBER COLLEGE, LLC | |
Represented By: | Nicholas J. Hanek |
Represented By: | David M. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.