Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 5:2023cv01677 |
| August 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order granting Plaintiff's #7 Motion for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/14/2023. (JLG)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Williamson, #2 Declaration of Patrick Paige, #3 Declaration of Susan Stalzer, #4 Proposed Order)(Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Request to Clerk for refund of erroneous or duplicate on-line filing fee payment. Reason for refund request: ling fee paid twice. Receipt #: AOHNDC-12154336, filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (S,HR) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided and no summons issued. (E,CK) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright (AO121) filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Works List)(Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 3 Complaint- Action for Damages for Property Rights Infringement with jury demand Errata against John Doe. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12154361. Filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Works List, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Thompson, Jeremy) Modified on 8/29/2023 (E,CK). |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - Uploaded in wrong case. Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright (AO121) filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Works List) (Thompson, Jeremy) Modified text on 8/29/2023 (E,CK). |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - Wrong document uploaded. Complaint with jury demand against John Doe. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12154336. Filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Works List, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Thompson, Jeremy) Modified on 8/29/2023 (E,CK). |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (E,CK) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (E,CK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John C. Ridge |
| Represented By: | Jeremy J. Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
