Schultz v. Lucci et al.
| Richard Schultz |
| Eugene A. Lucci, Robert J. Patton, John J. Eklund and Melissa Rubic |
| 5:2024cv00365 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 Americans with Disabilities |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Original Summons issued at the counter to Richard Schultz for service upon John J. Eklund, Eugene A. Lucci, Robert J. Patton, and Melissa Rubic. (E,CK) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/27/2024: #1 Corrected Summons) (E,CK).
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for temporary restraining order, Motion to show cause, and Other Ancillary Relief filed by Plaintiff Richard Schultz (unsigned). (E,CK)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint for Relief for violation of ADA Protections, and violation of civil liberties against John J. Eklund, Eugene A. Lucci, Robert J. Patton, and Melissa Rubic. Filing fee paid. $405. Receipt # 9443. Filed by Richard Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Divorce Decree signature page and Cleveland Clinic My Chart, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (E,CK)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (E,CK)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (E,CK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
