Philpott v. City of Stow et al.
| Michael Philpott |
| City of Stow, Stephan W. Miller, Samantha R. Wike, Kristopher J. Maruna, Douglas E. Quiner and Erika L. Johnson |
| 5:2024cv00580 |
| March 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Sara Lioi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Michael Philpott. (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Affidavit-Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be a refiling of terminated case 5:23-cv-1885. Filed by Michael Philpott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Damage from Search, #3 Exhibit 2 - Arrest Details, #4 Exhibit 3 - Proof Missising Warrant, #5 Exhibit 4 - Proof of Incarceration, #6 Exhibit 5 - Stow Police Department Vehicle Impound Record, #7 Exhibit 6 - Towing Invoice, #8 Exhibit 7 - Damage Estimate, #9 Exhibit 8 - 8-7-2023 Letter from City of Stow, #10 Exhibit 9 - Misc Costs and Damage, #11 Exhibit 10 - Personnel Complaint Form). (H,Ch) |
| Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
