Flowers, Inc. v. Springhill Floral & Gift Supply Co., et al.
| Flowers, Inc. doing business as burton + BURTON |
| Springhill Floral & Gift Supply Co. doing business as Directfloral and New Diamond Line Container Corp. doing business as Diamond Line Containers |
| 5:2024cv00590 |
| April 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Sara Lioi |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 4/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List) (E,CK) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon New Diamond Line Container Corp. and Springhill Floral & Gift Supply Co. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (E,CK) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Flowers, Inc. (Vernyuk, Sergey) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for copyright infringement with jury demand against New Diamond Line Container Corp. and Springhill Floral & Gift Supply Co. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12483746. Filed by Flowers, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reg. VA 2-326-802 and VA 2-331-003, #2 Exhibit B - Reg. VA 2-327-597 and VA 2-331-023, #3 Exhibit C - Reg. VA 2-328-008 and VA 2-330-995, #4 Exhibit D - Reg. VA 2-343-879, #5 Exhibit E - Reg. VA 2-363-438, #6 Exhibit F - Reg. VA 2-363-436, #7 Exhibit G - Reg. VA 2-363-404, #8 Exhibit H - Reg. VA 2-363-335, #9 Exhibit I - Reg. VA 2-363-466, #10 Exhibit J - Reg. VA 2-363-464, #11 Civil Cover Sheet, #12 Appendix Report on Filing a Copyright Action, #13 Summons). (Vernyuk, Sergey) |
| Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (E,CK) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (E,CK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Flowers, Inc. v. Springhill Floral & Gift Supply Co., et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Flowers, Inc. doing business as burton + BURTON | |
| Represented By: | John M. Skeriotis |
| Represented By: | Roger D. Emerson |
| Represented By: | Sergey V. Vernyuk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Springhill Floral & Gift Supply Co. doing business as Directfloral | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: New Diamond Line Container Corp. doing business as Diamond Line Containers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
