Dichiro v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Judith A. Dichiro |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2024cv00601 |
| April 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong |
| James S Gwin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Marginal Entry Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/1/24 granting plaintiff's #6 Motion to dismiss. (T,A)
|
| Filing 6 Stipulated Motion to dismiss filed by Plaintiff Judith A. Dichiro. (Shifrin, Debra) |
|
Filing 5
Report and Recommendation that the Court DENY Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP #2 . It is further RECOMMENDED that, if the Court denies Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP, she be ORDERED to pay the applicable filing fee within 14 days of the date of any such order. Objections to Report & Recommendation due by 4/18/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 4/4/2024. (K,L)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 4/3/2024. (K,L)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Sara Lioi. (E,CK) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Judith A. Dichiro. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Judith A. Dichiro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Shifrin, Debra) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (E,CK) |
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (E,CK) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 4/2/2024. (E,CK) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (E,CK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dichiro v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Judith A. Dichiro | |
| Represented By: | Debra S. Shifrin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | SSA-Office of General Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
