Delfino et al. v. Summit County, Ohio
Daniel Delfino, Mindy E. Delfino and State of Ohio |
Summit County, Ohio |
5:2024cv00743 |
April 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Benita Y Pearson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Summit County, Ohio. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,DL) |
Filing 1 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Monetary, Injunctive, and Other Relief, and Petition for Writ of Mandamus with jury demand against Summit County, Ohio. Filing fee paid $ 405.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-12528483. Filed by State of Ohio ex rel Mindy E. Delfino Co-Trustee of the Daniel R. Delfino Living Trust Dated August 22, 2022 and the Mindy E Delfino Living Trust Dated August 22, 2022, Daniel Delfino, State of Ohio ex rel Daniel Delfino Co-Trustee of the Daniel R. Delfino Living Trust Dated August 22, 2022 and the Mindy E Delfino Living Trust Dated August 22, 2022, Mindy E. Delfino. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Vacanti, Anthony) |
Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (B,DL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (B,DL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.