Legrair v. United States Postal Service et al.
| Alonzo Legrair |
| United States Postal Service and Felton Hicks |
| 5:2024cv02235 |
| December 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Felton Hicks, United States Postal Service, United States Postal Service c/o Northern District of Ohio Office of the U.S. Attorney, United States Postal Service c/o U.S. Department of Justice, and United States Postal Service c/o Postmaster General. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (E,CK) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Felton Hicks, United States Postal Service. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12885910.. Filed by Alonzo Legrair. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Police Report) (Lucas, Frank) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (E,CK) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (E,CK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
