Yechuri v. Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., et al.
| Dinesh Kumar Yechuri |
| Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., Anthony R. Pryor and John Doe |
| 5:2026cv01613 |
| July 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SM) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Removal to Adverse Parties filed by Heyl Truck Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Removal)(Cotter, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand (Related Doc #1 ) filed by Heyl Truck Lines, Inc.. (Cotter, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Heyl Truck Lines, Inc.. (Cotter, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Portage County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2026CV00552 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 405, receipt number AOHNDC-13771247.. Filed by Heyl Truck Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cotter, Christopher) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (S,SM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (S,SM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
