Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. United States of America et al
Case Number: 6:2006cv00558
Filed: December 29, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. White
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 218 ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White DENYING 202 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment AND GRANTING 212 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (tls, Deputy Clerk)
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 193 ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White granting Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Muscogee (Creek) Nation ( 181 Motion to Dismiss ) (lal, Deputy Clerk)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 135 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White denying defendants' motoin for dismissal or, in the alternative, for summary judgment (Re: 92 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 90 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment ), denying as moot defendants' motions in limine (Re: 106 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Bill S. Fife, 105 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Certain Evidence and Argument) and remanding case to defendants for additional investigation and explanation(terminates case)(law, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?