Barrett v. USA
| Kenneth Eugene Barrett |
| USA |
| 6:2009cv00105 |
| March 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office |
| Muskogee |
| James H. Payne |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
478
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White: affirming in part and denying in part 467 Report and Recommendation; Petitioner's 2255 motion is denied as it relates to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during the penalty phase of trial; Certificate of Appealability granted. dismissing/terminating case (case terminated) (tls, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
269
ORDER re: DISCOVERY by District Judge James H. Payne: denying 249 Petitioner's Motion to Conduct Discovery; granting 250 Government's Motion to Secure Trial Counsel's Files; denying in part and granting in part 251 Governme nt's Motion to Obtain Discovery from Defense Experts; denying 252 Government's Motion to Propound Interrogatories; granting 253 Government's Motion for Psychiatric Evaluation of Defendant; denying 254 Government's Motion to Serve Discovery on Third Parties; denying 255 Government's Motion to Serve Subpoenas Duces Tecum; granting 256 Government's Unopposed Motion to Permit Inspection of Expanded Record; denying in part and granting in part 257 Government's Unopposed Motion to Unseal Documents (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
221
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: denying 217 Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
216
JUDGMENT by District Judge James H. Payne entering judgment in favor of USA against Kenneth Eugene Barrett (terminates case) (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: granting 113 petitioner's Motion to Reconsider; Petitioner's brief due 3/1/10 at 4:30 p.m.; Status Conference RESET for 3/31/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Room 230, US Courthouse, 5th & Okmulgee, Muskogee, OK before District Judge James H. Payne; (granting in part 107 Motion to Continue Briefing Schedule; striking 1 Motion to Vacate Order/Judgment; striking 2 Corrected Motion to Vacate Order/Judgment; striking 70 Amended Motion to Vacate Order/Judgment) (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: Granting in part, denying in part and taking under advisement in part 52 Government's MOTION to Unseal, or to Gain Full Access to Motions, Orders, Reports and Proceedings filed Cr-04-115 (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrett v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth Eugene Barrett | |
| Represented By: | Tivon Schardl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Sheldon J. Sperling |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
