McCormick v. Parker, et al
| Robert Claude McCormick |
| Randy Parker and Drew Edmondson |
| 6:2010cv00117 |
| April 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Muskogee Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Kimberly E. West |
| James H. Payne |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: The Court reaffirms its earlier decision conditionally granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) on the petitioners double jeopardy claim. The writ of habeas corpus shall issue, as to Count II only, unless the State of Oklahoma commences new trial proceedings on the second Child Abuse count within 120 days of the entry of this Opinion and Order. (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne : The petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is conditionally granted on the petitioners double jeopardy claim. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 5 and Directing the Clerk of the Court to transfer the record in this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 4/7/2010. (brs, )[Transferred from okwd on 4/8/2010.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
