Zeeco, Inc. v. Sivec Srl
Plaintiff: Zeeco, Inc.
Defendant: Sivec Srl
Case Number: 6:2010cv00143
Filed: April 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Wagoner
Presiding Judge: Steven P. Shreder
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 134 JUDGMENT by District Judge James H. Payne: entering judgment pursuant to jury verdict in favor of Zeeco, Inc. against Sivec Srl; entering judgment pursuant to jury verdict on defendant's counterclaim in favor of Sivec Srl against Zeeco, Inc. (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zeeco, Inc. v. Sivec Srl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zeeco, Inc.
Represented By: Robert J. Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sivec Srl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?