Caring Hearts Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius
Plaintiff: Caring Hearts Hospice, Inc.
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Case Number: 6:2010cv00232
Filed: July 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: McCurtain
Presiding Judge: James H. Payne
Nature of Suit: Medicare Act
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White granting motion of plaintiff for preliminary injunction ( 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction), denying motion of defendant to dismiss ( 23 Motion to Dismiss) and finding motion of plaintiff to expedite ruling as moot ( 29 Motion to Expedite Ruling ) (law, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caring Hearts Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caring Hearts Hospice, Inc.
Represented By: Sarah J. Glick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?