Qualls v. Family Shelter of Southern Oklahoma
Plaintiff: Retha Qualls
Defendant: Family Shelter of Southern Oklahoma
Case Number: 6:2011cv00205
Filed: June 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Carter
Presiding Judge: Frank H. Seay
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay granting in part 19 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment; remanding case (terminates case) (trl, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Qualls v. Family Shelter of Southern Oklahoma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Retha Qualls
Represented By: Amber L. Hurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Family Shelter of Southern Oklahoma
Represented By: Jim T. Priest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?