Adams v. Unarco Industries
Plaintiff: Doris Adams
Defendant: Unarco Industries
Case Number: 6:2011cv00420
Filed: November 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Wagoner
Presiding Judge: Frank H. Seay
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay granting 6 Motion to Remand to State Court. (case terminated) (Documents Terminated: 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court ) (trl, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Unarco Industries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unarco Industries
Represented By: Christopher S. Thrutchley
Represented By: William Kirk Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doris Adams
Represented By: Donald E. Smolen, II
Represented By: Daniel E. Smolen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?