Burnett v. Miller et al
Plaintiff: Stephen Burnett
Defendant: Kathy Miller, Raymond Larimer, Nancy Colpetzer and Mark Reiheld
Case Number: 6:2012cv00158
Filed: April 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Hughes
Presiding Judge: Steven P. Shreder
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. White
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 241 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White: Defendants motion for summary judgment 232 is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claim regarding the conditions of the medical cell is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file second motion for summary judgment 230 is DENIED as moot. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
May 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 217 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White directing defendants to file a response within 21 days to the remanded issue (re: 213 ). Plaintiff granted 21 days to file a reply to defendant's response, if appropriate. (Re: 213 USCA Decision ) (neh, Deputy Clerk)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 202 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : The defendants second motion for summary judgement 180 is GRANTED, and this action is, in all respects, DISMISSED as frivolous and malicious. This dismissal shall count as a STRIKE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). All remaining pending motions are DENIED as moot. 146 147 150 153 156 165 168 177 189 (acg, Deputy Clerk)
December 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : The defendants are directed to show cause in writing within seven days for failure to comply with the Order Staying Proceedings and Requiring Special Report, and plaintiff's pending motions 46 47 48 49 50 51 are stricken without prejudice.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burnett v. Miller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Burnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathy Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond Larimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Colpetzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Reiheld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?