Price et al v. LeFlore County Criminal Justice Authority et al
| Loretta Price |
| Brandi Saulsberry, Rob Seale, LeFlore County Detention Center, Inc., Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust, Poteau, City of, LeFlore County Board of County Commissioners, LeFlore County Criminal Justice Authority, LeFlore County Buildings Authority, John Doe Entity, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 6:2013cv00402 |
| September 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Muskogee Office |
| Le Flore |
| James H. Payne |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: granting in part and denying in part 85 Motion for Expedited Order Staying Discovery and Deadlines; granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion for Expedited Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion to Extend Deadlines; resetting motion deadlines: Responses due by 10/17/2014, Replies due by 10/24/2014 Re: 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment; directing Plaintiff to show cause by 10/17/2014 Re: John and Jane Does (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
89
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: denying 81 Defendant Trust's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Response; granting in part 49 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
